FTFIP Platinum LyonRound of 32

Garrido/Gutierrez vs Axelsson/Guichard

Javier Garrido & Sanyo Gutierrez  vs  Adam Axelsson & Dylan Guichard · 6-3 4-6 4-6

Head-to-head: Javier Garrido vs Adam Axelsson →

Odds move constantly — always confirm the price at the bookmaker before betting. Implied probability and margin are derived from the prices shown. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.

How it was won

Axelsson/Guichard beat Garrido/Gutierrez 6-3 4-6 4-6.

It was Round of 32 of FIP Platinum Lyon.

It went the distance, decided in the third.

It was the 2nd time Axelsson and Garrido have faced each other, partners aside, and Axelsson leads that 2-0.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Going in

Garrido/Gutierrez
1773Power Rating going in
Axelsson/Guichard
1696Power Rating going in
2 earlier matches here, the last one 2 days before

The lower-rated pair won

Form is this exact pair, not either player with another partner. The rating is ours, replayed to the day of the match — not today’s.

The match, set by set

Garrido/Gutierrez Axelsson/Guichard
S16-3
S24-6
S34-6

Garrido vs Axelsson, every meeting

0-2 in the series2 of 2 went to a deciding set
How the wins came
Garrido/Gutierrez0 in straight sets · 0 in three
Axelsson/Guichard0 in straight sets · 2 in three
The lead, meeting by meeting

Above the line is Garrido/Gutierrez ahead; below it, Axelsson/Guichard.

These two pairs have met only this once, so this is every match where the two players above were on opposite sides, whoever they were partnered with.

In the draw

Axelsson/Guichard had beaten Garrido/Gutierrez to get here.

Axelsson/Guichard lost to Caruso/Santigosa 5-7 3-6 in their next match.

It was Garrido/Gutierrez’s last match of the tournament.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Keep it about the padel. No tips, no promotions, no links to bookmakers — those get removed. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.