FTWorld Padel Tour Malmo

Lopez/Lamperti vs Gutierrez/Gutierrez

Diaz & Lamperti  vs  Gutierrez & Gutierrez · 7-6 4-6 5-7

Head-to-head: Diaz vs Gutierrez →

Odds move constantly — always confirm the price at the bookmaker before betting. Implied probability and margin are derived from the prices shown. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.

How it was won

Gutierrez/Gutierrez beat Diaz/Lamperti 7-6 4-6 5-7.

The match was played at World Padel Tour Malmo.

It went the distance, decided in the third.

One set went to a tiebreak.

It was the 2nd time Gutierrez and Diaz have faced each other, partners aside, and Gutierrez leads that 2-0.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Going in

Lopez/Lamperti
1418Power Rating going in
One earlier match here, the last one the day before
Gutierrez/Gutierrez
1783Power Rating going in
One earlier match here, the last one the day before

Form is this exact pair, not either player with another partner. The rating is ours, replayed to the day of the match — not today’s.

The match, set by set

Lopez/Lamperti Gutierrez/Gutierrez
S17-6
S24-6
S35-7

Diaz vs Gutierrez, every meeting

0-2 in the series1 of 2 went to a deciding set
How the wins came
Lopez/Lamperti0 in straight sets · 0 in three
Gutierrez/Gutierrez1 in straight sets · 1 in three
The lead, meeting by meeting

Above the line is Lopez/Lamperti ahead; below it, Gutierrez/Gutierrez.

These two pairs have met only this once, so this is every match where the two players above were on opposite sides, whoever they were partnered with.

In the draw

Gutierrez/Gutierrez had beaten Gil/Moyano to get here.

Gutierrez/Gutierrez lost to Coello/Tapia 4-6 6-4 6-1 in their next match.

It was Diaz/Lamperti’s last match of the tournament.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Keep it about the padel. No tips, no promotions, no links to bookmakers — those get removed. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.