FTFIP Silver Vila Real De Santo AntonioRound of 32

Del Castillo/Vilariño vs Rutgersson/Jesus

Mario Del Castillo & Nacho Vilariño  vs  Douglas Rutgersson & Diogo Jesus · 6-1 6-7 6-1

Head-to-head: Mario Del Castillo vs Douglas Rutgersson →

Odds move constantly — always confirm the price at the bookmaker before betting. Implied probability and margin are derived from the prices shown. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.

How it was won

Castillo/Vilariño beat Rutgersson/Jesus 6-1 6-7 6-1.

It was Round of 32 of FIP Silver Vila Real De Santo Antonio.

It went the distance, decided in the third.

One set went to a tiebreak.

It was the 2nd time Castillo and Rutgersson have faced each other, partners aside, and Castillo leads that 2-0.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Going in

Del Castillo/Vilariño
1683Power Rating going in
Rutgersson/Jesus
1584Power Rating going in
One earlier match here, the last one 2 days before

Form is this exact pair, not either player with another partner. The rating is ours, replayed to the day of the match — not today’s.

The match, set by set

Del Castillo/Vilariño Rutgersson/Jesus
S16-1
S26-7
S36-1

Castillo vs Rutgersson, every meeting

2-0 in the series2 of 2 went to a deciding set
How the wins came
Del Castillo/Vilariño0 in straight sets · 2 in three
Rutgersson/Jesus0 in straight sets · 0 in three
The lead, meeting by meeting

Above the line is Del Castillo/Vilariño ahead; below it, Rutgersson/Jesus.

These two pairs have met only this once, so this is every match where the two players above were on opposite sides, whoever they were partnered with.

In the draw

Castillo/Vilariño went on to beat Cordoba/Chang 6-1 6-2.

It was Rutgersson/Jesus’s last match of the tournament.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Keep it about the padel. No tips, no promotions, no links to bookmakers — those get removed. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.