FTFIP Platinum Ville De MarseilleFinals

Leal/Guerrero vs Garrido/Bergamini

Javier Leal & Francisco Guerrero  vs  Javier Garrido & Lucas Bergamini · 3-6 6-3 6-4

Head-to-head: Javier Leal vs Javier Garrido →

Odds move constantly — always confirm the price at the bookmaker before betting. Implied probability and margin are derived from the prices shown. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.

How it was won

Leal/Guerrero beat Garrido/Bergamini 3-6 6-3 6-4.

It was Finals of FIP Platinum Ville De Marseille.

It went the distance, decided in the third.

It was the 9th time Garrido and Leal have faced each other, partners aside, and Garrido still leads that 7-2.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Going in

Leal/Guerrero
1825Power Rating going in
3 earlier matches here, the last one the day before
Garrido/Bergamini
1777Power Rating going in
3 earlier matches here, the last one the day before

Form is this exact pair, not either player with another partner. The rating is ours, replayed to the day of the match — not today’s.

The match, set by set

Leal/Guerrero Garrido/Bergamini
S13-6
S26-3
S36-4

Leal vs Garrido, every meeting

2-7 in the series3 of 9 went to a deciding setthe first set decided 7 of 9
How the wins came
Leal/Guerrero1 in straight sets · 1 in three
Garrido/Bergamini5 in straight sets · 2 in three
The lead, meeting by meeting

Above the line is Leal/Guerrero ahead; below it, Garrido/Bergamini.

These two pairs have met only this once, so this is every match where the two players above were on opposite sides, whoever they were partnered with.

In the draw

Leal/Guerrero had come through Sanchez/Gil, Campagnolo/Bautista and Gutierrez/Alfonso.

It was Garrido/Bergamini’s last match of the tournament.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Keep it about the padel. No tips, no promotions, no links to bookmakers — those get removed. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.