FTPremier Padel Riyadh Women

Sanchez/Josemaria vs Salazar/Icardo

Sanchez & Josemaria  vs  Salazar & Icardo · 6-3 6-3

Head-to-head: Sanchez vs Salazar →

Odds move constantly — always confirm the price at the bookmaker before betting. Implied probability and margin are derived from the prices shown. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.

How it was won

Sanchez/Josemaria beat Salazar/Icardo 6-3 6-3.

The match was played at Premier Padel Riyadh Women.

It was settled in straight sets.

It was the 41st time Sanchez and Salazar have faced each other, partners aside, and Sanchez leads that 26-15.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Going in

Sanchez/Josemaria
1950Power Rating going in
3 earlier matches here, the last one the day before
Salazar/Icardo
1768Power Rating going in
2 earlier matches here, the last one the day before

Form is this exact pair, not either player with another partner. The rating is ours, replayed to the day of the match — not today’s.

The match, set by set

Sanchez/Josemaria Salazar/Icardo
S16-3
S26-3

Sanchez vs Salazar, every meeting

26-15 in the series13 of 41 went to a deciding setthe first set decided 34 of 41
How the wins came
Sanchez/Josemaria20 in straight sets · 6 in three
Salazar/Icardo8 in straight sets · 7 in three
The lead, meeting by meeting

Above the line is Sanchez/Josemaria ahead; below it, Salazar/Icardo.

These two pairs have met only this once, so this is every match where the two players above were on opposite sides, whoever they were partnered with.

In the draw

Sanchez/Josemaria had come through Talavan/Rodriguez, Carnicero/Sharifova and Virseda/Osoro.

Sanchez/Josemaria went on to beat Brea/Gonzalez 6-3 6-2.

It was Salazar/Icardo’s last match of the tournament.

Assembled from the results on this page — every line is a number, not an opinion.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Keep it about the padel. No tips, no promotions, no links to bookmakers — those get removed. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.